Mason Hayes Solicitors

Practical Solutions through Industry Expertise Practical Solutions through Industry Expertise Practical Solutions through Industry Expertise

Author Archive

Back to Law School!

Wednesday, May 20th, 2015

This month has been rather hectic as I have been seconded to work in house with a new client and have also started my Professional Skills Course.  Many of you may think that you have seen the back of education after completing the LPC but, alas, this is not the case!  However, the courses that trainees are obligated to take are obviously designed to ensure that you are fully aware of the standards and obligations that are placed upon solicitors at the outset of your career.  I found my first course on client care to be both interesting and highly useful for everyday practice.  Although elements of this course are taught on the LPC, it is not truly appreciated by students how important this is until you begin practising.

For instance, we were given details of several scenarios in which a conflict may appear and were asked to decipher whether you should or should not act for the potential client in each scenario.  Whilst it may not always be overtly obvious that a conflict has arisen, it is important that firms have a robust system in place to ensure that they do not inadvertently act in situations where a conflict may arise.

During the course of this month I have also spent the best part of a week working with the Managing Director on the south coast in the offices of a new commercial client.  We are looking to take on a number of matters for the client for our debt recovery department.  I therefore spent my time in meetings with different managers and staff members in an effort to understand the mechanisms of the business.  The aim is to set up a process with the client in which we both work together towards the same end game.  Being involved in this kind of meeting is invaluable in the development of my commercial awareness.  As a firm it is our belief that you are not able to act for your client to your best ability without truly understanding your client’s business and its ethos.  These early days are therefore of the utmost importance in laying the foundations and building the relationship.

Since returning from the meetings, I have been and still am assisting in the drafting of precedent letters whilst considering how our claims will be pleaded.  Whilst I have found this challenging and thought provoking, it has been a thoroughly enjoyable and rewarding experience.

Until next month,

Kimberley

Mediation

Friday, April 24th, 2015

Mediation is one of the most popular forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) and is often a very successful way to resolve disputes.  The parties appoint an independent third party who runs the day and assists the parties with the negotiations.  The mediator has no allegiances and is there purely to see if the parties can resolve their issues without incurring further costs or, at the very least, narrow the issues between the parties.

As a firm, Mason Hayes actively encourages all of its clients to give serious consideration to mediation.  This is particularly important when considering the recent dramatic increase on court fees.  Clients should consider, not only the possibility of losing at court, but also the costs of progressing a case and the risk of receiving an adversarial costs order if they unreasonably refuse to engage in ADR.

It is important to ensure that the client is fully informed of the risks and purposes of the mediation before it is organised.  The client should be aware that the day is focussed on trying to reach a compromise between the parties that each party feels comfortable with.  It is not about one party winning and the other loosing as it would be in court.  It also takes away the risk of having a third party impose a solution on you which is binding and which you may strongly disagree with.

Having said this, it must not be forgotten that there are limits to the use of mediation.  For instance, if there is a particular point of law which is either unclear or is yet to be determined then this may necessitate proceedings and a final hearing.  Further, mediation can be a costly exercise and if the parties have no intention of compromising or conceding any of the issues then it is not always a productive solution.

In a mediation the client is able to stay in control of the negotiations but must always be mindful of what the worst case scenario may be in terms of outcome and costs if the mediation fails.  The client can then make an informed reasonable assessment of the situation and decide how far they are willing to concede legal issues and costs in the spirit of compromise.

Mediation should always be considered no matter what the value of the claim.  I have frequently conducted mediations via telephone with the Small Claims Mediation Services on smaller matters under the value of £10,000 and have found it a very effective way of settling claims early without having to incur the costs of a final hearing.  More recently I have had the opportunity to accompany the Managing Director of the firm to a mediation in London on behalf of a client.

The experience of mediation on a larger scale helped me to see and understand the benefits of ADR in action.  Prior to the mediation, the parties were far apart on the contentious issues and neither party were willing to concede any points in correspondence.  However, thankfully the case did manage to settle at the end of a long day of negotiations (although admittedly it did run over the allotted time due to some last minute changes of details!).

The important thing for your client to remember is that it is highly unlikely that either party is going to leave a mediation feeling that they got everything they wanted.  The process is about compromise and making sensible, reasonable offers.

Until next month,

Kimberley

Charitable Trust

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015

Mason Hayes takes its social responsibility very seriously and this can be seen through the continuous work of the Mason Hayes Charitable Trust.  The Trust was set up to assist law students who are the first in their families to attend University.  The aim is to fight the social and economic boundaries and stereotypes associated with the law and those who work within it and assist students who possess the natural ability and necessary work ethic to achieve a successful career in the law.  This is something I can truly empathise with as I was the first person in my family to, not only study law, but go to University.  I am therefore very keen to involve myself in the work of the Trust and help those students who need it as much as I can.

We recognise that, not only is it extremely difficult to get a training contract in the current legal job market, but that valuable work experience is also difficult to come by if you do not have contacts within the profession.  The Trust therefore provides a comprehensive work experience scheme to students during the summer months.  We take four students in our offices and provide them with a tailor made work experience placement offering them an insight into what life within a commercial law firm is really like.  To this end, I drafted a seminar for the students last summer which used one of our larger commercial litigation matters as a case study.  This is often the first time students have had the opportunity to apply the theory of the law that they have learnt in University to a genuine case in practice.

I also had my first opportunity to engage with the students on a personal level last summer.  As part of the scheme the students are given the opportunity to talk to all members of staff and ask any questions they may have about the job market and draw upon their experience.  We also take them out to lunch on their final day as a treat and to reflect upon what they have learnt during their placement.

Over the years the Trust has expanded and it now reaches beyond the scope of University students.  Primary schools and high schools are now included in the work of the Trust in order to reach out to people as young as possible and instil the message that you can achieve whatever it is that you want to achieve in life despite difficulties and potential setbacks.  I recently attended an award ceremony at a primary school where the Managing Director of Mason Hayes gave a speech to inspire the children and present those who had tried hard over the year with a trophy and book vouchers.

I look forward to becoming more involved with the Trust as I progress through my training contract and having the opportunity to engage more with students.  I am hoping to be involved in writing and delivering a seminar with some students later this year at the University which will be my first experience of public speaking in a legal context!

Until next month,

 

Kimberley

 

 

Experiences

Saturday, February 14th, 2015

I thought I would talk this month about the experiences I have had as a trainee solicitor at Mason Hayes so far!  After just 3 months I have already undertaken a very varied set of tasks.  Being part of a smaller niche firm has allowed me to be more hands on in the cases that I assist with.  I have therefore been asked to complete first drafts of documents such as a Letter of Claim and a Mediation Position Statement as well as being involved in tactical discussions of how to progress matters and discussions surrounding the merits of a claim.

As I started as a Paralegal, I had already been given a case load prior to the start of my training contract.  I have worked closely on a fast track matter for nearing 18 months now for which I have drafted the pleadings and attended various interim hearings.  As the case was nearing its final hearing I have recently held further discussions with the client and it was decided that the claim should be settled.

I therefore entered into negotiations with the other side with a view to settling the matter.  After a lengthy discussion with the Claimant, I managed to settle the claim for around 30% of what the Claimant had originally stated on its Claim Form as well as coming to an arrangement on other non-monetary issues surrounding the matter.  I have previously conducted mediations on the small claims track for our clients but this was my first opportunity to enter into negotiations on a bigger scale and I was proud to have achieved a successful outcome for our client.

More recently I have attended a conference with Counsel on behalf of a Premiership footballer client.  The dispute here arose as a consequence of a rather obscure piece of law, the Mortgage Conduct of Business Rules (also known as the MCOBs).  Our client is now looking to be compensated for the losses that have incurred as a result of bad advice.

As well as large international companies, Mason Hayes also acts for individuals on a range of disputes.  I am currently heavily involved in a neighbour dispute regarding a right of way.  This has been the first time that I have been involved in anything of this sort and I have found it really interesting to watch it unfold.  During the course of this matter I have drafted Instructions to Counsel, attended several conferences with Counsel and drafted lengthy correspondence to the other side fully detailing our client’s position.

Well I best stop talking about it now and get back to work, until next month!

Kimberley

Commercial Awareness

Thursday, January 15th, 2015

Whilst studying for the GDL and LPC, the hot topic of conversation around law school was ‘Commercial Awareness’.  Everyone was keen to emphasise the importance of the need for students to be ‘commercially aware’ but there was very little understanding of what commercial awareness actually is.

At its most basic level, I would suggest that commercial awareness can be split into two categories:

  • law firms functioning as a business; and
  • understanding the needs of your client in a commercial context.

Law Firms as a Business

Students need to appreciate how a law firm operates and understand what is important to them for instance, profitability and cash flow.  Students should aim to demonstrate this understanding in front of an interview panel.  In order to do this students should carry out research into the background of a firm and look into:

  • the context in which it operates;
  • whether it has merged in the past; and
  • what the firm’s strategy is for growth.

The Needs of your Client in a Commercial Context

Your client will not be looking for an academically sound answer to their queries, but one which is right in the context of their business.  Fundamentally, businesses exist to make money and they will be coming to you to help develop and progress their business rather than to learn about complex legal arguments.  Clients want a confident answer to their legal problems but will not be too interested in how you reached that answer.

In order to advise your client you need to know their objectives which will enable you to then tailor your advice accordingly.  Providing the best service to clients means not only advising on the law, but also understanding each client’s business and objectives.

Developing and Demonstrating your Commercial Awareness

You may think that you do not have any commercial experience.  However, you can use your legal work experience, your own research and other non-legal work experience in application forms and then discuss them at interview.  For example, whilst I was studying, I worked for a large well known bank.  I developed an understanding of the importance of customer service, the need to tailor your approach to each individual client, the market, the competition and targets.  I was able to use my understanding and experience of these areas of business to demonstrate commercial awareness at interview.

However, you do not need to work in the corporate world to develop such awareness.  You can pick up a lot of business knowledge by working in a cafe, for instance. Think about a beach cafe and how the weather affects custom and how the management of stock may be impacted.  Ultimately most jobs will assist if you reflect and think about what you’ve learnt and consider how you can then apply it in an application or at an interview.

You can also improve your commercial awareness outside of the working world by reading about deals and stories in a business sector that genuinely interests you.  This could be a football club’s administration for instance or the merger of two retail giants if you have an interest in fashion.  If you tailor your research in this way it will make the process more interesting and enjoyable and enable you to talk with enthusiasm at an interview.

There are other areas of life where you can also demonstrate your commerciality.  For example, consider whether you have ever taken part in any of the following activities:

  • organised an event or trip;
  • sat on university society committees;
  • discussed budgets;
  • Young Enterprise Award at school; or
  • volunteered in an organisation.

It is important to remember that law firms require candidates to be commercially aware for a valid reason.  It is not something that you need just to get through the interview stage but something you will exercise on a daily basis when you start your training contract.  It is something that will constantly develop throughout your career as a solicitor.  You cannot advise your client sufficiently if you do not have an understanding of how they operate and what they are trying to achieve.

Once you have obtained your training contract you may find that your firm will actively get you involved in business development within the firm immediately by taking you to client events and marketing events.  Firms often send their trainees on client secondment to give them an insight into the commercial world.  I was lucky enough to be placed in house in a client’s legal team for two weeks whilst undergoing an extensive disclosure exercise.  This really gave me an insight on how the business worked on a day to day basis and helped me understand its goals and strategies.

I hope this has been of some assistance!

Until next month,

Kimberley

Hello

Monday, December 22nd, 2014

Hello!

I am the new trainee solicitor here at Mason Hayes and I would like to give you a brief outline of my journey so far.  I decided against taking the traditional route into law and instead began my higher education at the University of Liverpool studying History.  After then graduating in 2010, I went on to study for a Graduate Diploma in Law (“GDL”) at what was then known as The College of Law.  I decided to take this alternative route for a multitude of reasons.  Before starting at Liverpool I had already made the decision to pursue a career in law.  However, whilst considering my options and trying to decide whether to apply for History or Law, I was informed about the possibility of completing a GDL within just one year and I therefore made the decision to study a subject that I had always loved and enjoyed.  This decision has definitely broadened my horizons and also gives me something a bit different to discuss in interviews.

After completing the rather demanding GDL, I then went on to study the LPC full time graduating in 2012.  Following this, I took an in house role in a debt management firm as a fee earning legal assistant before moving to Mason Hayes as a paralegal.  The road to becoming a Trainee Solicitor has by no means been easy but I have found it to be both challenging and rewarding.

As many of the application deadlines for the larger firms are rapidly approaching, I am sure most students and/or graduates are beginning to prepare to complete applications and interviews.  I have therefore outlined below some guidance in respect of the Vacation Scheme/Training Contract application process which I hope will be of some assistance to you.

Where do I apply?

Before beginning to draft any application, you must first of all think very carefully about what it is you want to achieve in your legal career and what is important to you.  In doing so, you should consider which practice area(s) you would like to gain experience in, what industry or sector is of interest to you, where you would like to be located, what salary you want to earn and how important a work/life balance is to you.

You will then need to undertake detailed research of the legal market and find those firms that can offer you what it is that you want.  Your research should not be limited to the internet.  I would encourage you to attend law fairs, firm open days and presentation evenings.  In my experience this provides a greater insight to a firm than simply reading the website.

Once you have conducted this research you should then have a list of firms which you consider are right for you.  You should then conduct more detailed research about those firms in order to have everything you need to begin drafting your application.  However, before beginning to prepare any applications, you should draw up a timetable to ensure that you have given yourself enough time to draft and submit the applications before the deadline.

Prepare thoroughly for common questions

You will find that firms tend to ask the same or similar questions.  A good example of this is “Why do you want to pursue a career in law?” or “Why do you want to be a solicitor?”  These are questions you will undoubtedly be asked at any interview.  You should therefore put some thought into your answer for this and make your answer as personal as you can, taking care to avoid generic responses.

Another classic question is “Why do you want to work for our firm?” If you adopted the approach which I outlined above regarding finding firms that are right for you, your research should provide the basis of your response to this question.  There was a reason that you added that particular firm to your list, or at least there should have been!  If there isn’t a reason, why are you applying?

Competency Questions

The application may well contain a competency based question but they are also very common interview questions.  An example being “Describe an occasion where you worked within a team and where your contribution made an impact on the team’s performance.”  When answering these types of question you should always adopt the STAR approach: Situation, Task, Activity and Response.  I would suggest preparing a couple of factual scenarios which you could use for such questions before any interview and practice answering the questions using the factual scenario and the STAR approach.  This will help you give a clear and structured answer in your interview.  If you have answered a competency based question in your application, be prepared for further questions from the interviewer(s).

Check, check and check again!

You should proof read your final draft.  I would also recommend asking somebody to check it for you such as an advisor at your University career centre, a lecturer or even a family member.  It is no exaggeration that if there is one typo or grammatical error in your application then it will end up in the bin.  Remember the firm has to go through thousands of applications to decide who to see at interview.  Do not give them any excuse to throw yours in the bin!

Interview skills

It sounds obvious but making a good impression at an interview is all about preparation and presentation.  You should therefore revisit the research you did when you applied and conduct up to date research before the interview and review your application.

The interview is really a chance for the firm to see what you are really like.  You should take confidence from the fact that the firm is interested in you on the basis of your application.  This is what you should be reminding yourself of when you are waiting in the reception area to go in!

The most important thing from my experience is to engage with the interviewer(s) so that it is more of a conversation than a question and answer session.  You need to show good communication skills, so listen to the question and answer it directly rather than reciting something which you had rehearsed in advance of the interview which relates to the topic but does not truly answer the question.   Don’t forget the basics such as eye contact and body language.

Before any interview you should prepare questions for the interviewer.  It is important to remember that as well as you being right for the firm, you must establish whether the firm is right for you.  You may ask questions regarding something that you have seen in the news about the firm or one of its clients, what the likelihood is that you will get a seat (or in the case of a Vacation Scheme a week) in a certain department, what the retention rates of trainees were the previous year or what the goals of the firm are both short and long term as a business.

General points:

  1. Always remember firms are hiring for future partners and not just for a trainee!  Do not therefore be surprised if you are asked a hypothetical question such as “You are a partner, you have the option of having one client whose matter is likely to generate fees of £1million or taking five matters which are likely to generate fees of £100,000.  Which would you chose?”, or even something like “If you were chairperson, what would you change about the firm?”
  2. Be pro-active, tenacious and determined.  Do not sit and wait for a training contract to land on your lap…because it won’t!

I wish you all the best of luck with your applications!

Kimberley

Post coming soon!

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2014

September 2014

Tuesday, September 30th, 2014

Working with Counsel

There are continuing changes to the traditional relationship between the two branches of the legal profession.  It is still the case however that key distinctions still apply, albeit the lines have been blurred.

Traditionally, the bar has been a “referral profession” whereby a barrister is approached by a solicitor to act on behalf of the solicitor’s client.  Whilst it is now possible in some instances for a barrister to be instructed by a client directly, the norm is still very much for a barrister to be instructed by a solicitor.

It will however be interesting to see how the trend goes over the next few years.  From what I have seen clients who use chambers offering a direct access service will still require the service of solicitors in some shape or form.  There are commentators who suggest that there will ultimately be fusion of the two professions but I think that is unlikely to be the case, in the short term at least.   It will continue to be the case that clients will be assisted by a legal team consisting of a solicitor and a barrister.

Here at Mason Hayes we instruct from a list of preferred barristers.  There have been instances where the client has insisted upon use of a certain barrister.  However, on the whole the client will instruct one of the barristers recommended by us.

It is common practice, certainly in Commercial Litigation matters, for a barrister to be instructed in the early stages of a dispute and before the client commits to its position (either in pre-action correspondence or in pleadings).  That is so that the client is aware as early as possible what its prospects are, what the risks or evidential issues are, what the strategy is generally and what the best and worst case scenarios are.

It is important to have a barrister involved in that early stage as they will ultimately be the person who makes those arguments to the Judge.   As barristers have a better perspective of how evidence and/or legal arguments are likely to be received by the Court given their greater advocacy experience, it is important that a barrister is involved from the outset.

Equally and from the perspective of the barrister, they will have a better knowledge and understanding of the case if they have been instructed previously, rather than if they are instructed for the first time in advance of the Trial, having not been involved in the initial formulation of the client’s position or in considering evidential matters.

The best way of looking at the relationship between a solicitor and a barrister is to look at it as one of a team working together.  Whilst it is true to say that the role of solicitors and barristers can overlap in part, there is a distinct difference in skill sets and experience which means that a client will require services from both a solicitor and barrister in any substantial litigation dispute.

Until my next blog

Jessica

Who are the Victims of Hackers?

Tuesday, August 19th, 2014

In June this year in the case of Frontier Systems Limited t/as Voiceflex –v- FRIP Finishing Limited [2014] EWHC 1907 the Technology & Construction Court had to consider who was responsible to pay where hackers had infiltrated a telephone system and made over 10,000 international calls. 

Background to the claim

Voiceflex carried on a business providing telephony services over the internet and Frip carried on a business as decorative print finishers and was therefore the customer and/or end user.  One weekend in October 2011 Frip’s router was hacked and over 10,000 international calls were made to a premium telephone number in Poland.  Voiceflex raised an invoice in respect of those calls which totalled £35,560.20.  Frip refused to pay as it had not made the calls and a dispute therefore arose.    

The service

The service which Voiceflex provided was one whereby Frip was permitted to use Voiceflex’s system to transmit IP packets from Frip’s router to Voiceflex’s call server via the internet.  The process is often called “SIP trunk” within the industry. 

The claim

Voiceflex brought two claims.  The first being for the price of services supplied to Frip, and in the alternative, a claim for damages for breach of contract.  The alternative claim was based upon breaches of one express term and a number of implied terms which were as follows:

  1. Frip was not to divulge the router password and was to use all reasonable endeavours to keep it confidential and inaccessible to third parties;
  2. Frip was to take all reasonable steps to ensure that its networks were adequately protected from being accessed by unauthorised third parties; and
  3. Frip was to take all reasonable steps to ensure that any hardware installed by, or on behalf of, Frip was installed in such a manner that it was secure from access by unauthorised third parties. 

 The decision

 Claim for services

 The Court concluded that the proper construction of the contract was that Frip was only liable to pay for the cost of calls actually made.  It was therefore not the case that Voiceflex simply had to prove that it had made the service available to Frip in order to recover the costs of calls made, not by Frip, but by an unknown third party as a result of fraudulent activity.

What was detrimental to Voiceflex’s claim was the repeated reference in its terms and condition to “using” which lead the Court to conclude that the trigger for liability to pay was use of the service rather than the mere supply of the service.    

The Court then considered the question of use by an unknown third party rather than by Frip. The express term which confirmed an obligation on Frip not to divulge the password and to take reasonable steps to keep the password confidential was considered to be relevant.  The Court concluded that the inference that was to be drawn from that express term was that, if Frip complied with that obligation, it would not be liable for the cost of calls made by unknown third parties. 

The Court also took into the account the fact that Voiceflex had subsequently amended its terms and conditions so as to confirm that its customer would be liable to pay for calls made whether fraudulently or otherwise. 

Breach of Contract

As to the alternative argument, the Court accepted that the two implied terms outlined above were incorporated. However, the claim failed due to a lack of particularity and evidence in respect of the alleged breaches.  As to the allegation that Frip had not taken all reasonable steps to secure its network,  the Court found that Voiceflex had not put forward what Frip did, but should not have done; or conversely what Frip did not do, but should have done.  The claim therefore failed. 

Equally, and as to the allegation that Frip did not take all reasonable steps with regard to the password, the Court found that the allegation lacked any particularity and failed to allege what reasonable steps Frip should have taken to prevent such an event occurring.  It was suggested that the password strength was not sufficient being 8 digits, and it was submitted that the password could have been up to 20 digits.  The Court accepted the expert evidence that 8 digits was sufficiently strong and that in reality the number of digits was irrelevant as the software used to attack the password does not need to know how many digits.  

Finally, it was alleged by Voiceflex that Frip had left open port 5060.  It however failed to discharge the burden of proof and the Court concluded the port was not left open as alleged. 

General Condition 11

Frip attempted to defend the claim on a further ground.  That was that General Condition 11 prevented Voiceflex from raising an invoice in respect of the calls as the service had not in fact been provided to Frip. It was averred that the purpose of General Condition 11 was to place the risk of incurring the cost of calls fraudulently made by unknown third parties upon the service provider, as opposed to the end user. 

As the Court had already determined the matter as outlined above, the comments made were therefore obiter only.  The Court concluded that General Condition 11 simply meant that any bill rendered should be accurate. Moreover, that it was not intended to specifically address the situation where there had been fraudulent activity. 

Considerations for Service Providers

Hacking is now prevalent and service providers should be giving serious consideration to how such scenarios should be addressed when they arise but also how such situations can be prevented. It is important to ensure that what is decided is outlined clearly and concisely within the terms and conditions.    

In terms of prevention, it may be preferable to offer tools to enable the end user to secure the hardware and network which the end user has sole control over and is therefore solely responsible for.  Irrespective of whether the contract provides for the sole responsibility to lie with the end user, a pro-active approach should be considered by the service provider.  It is not commercially sensible for a network provider to simply rely on the end user and/or a re-seller to protect the systems against fraud.    

Voiceflex has, for example, introduced its own fraud detection application for its customers called Advanced Behavioural Based Analysis (“ABBA”) which monitors activity and can red flag, limit, block and/or  suspend activity.  Whilst this has been implemented as a standard feature of the service, Voiceflex has confirmed that many end users and re-sellers do not use the feature.  Voiceflex itself takes steps to attempt to access any apparent open ports and where an open port is found, it reports its finding to the client for immediate action to be taken.  

In terms of catering for when fraudulent activity occurs, it is important for service providers to review their terms and conditions in respect of their charges, whether that includes liability for any fraudulent activity and what triggers liability.  Equally it is important to undertake a review with regard to the obligations of the end user with regard to its hardware and network.  These obligations should be as specific as possible. 

If it is not the intention of the service provider to provide for the end user to be liable for fraudulent activity then it is going to be paramount to have rigid obligations as to what they must do to secure the network and hardware.  It should be made clear that should those obligations not be fully complied with, then the end user will become liable for any charges incurred by way fraudulent activity, as well as any other claims for damages for breach of contract.  If this approach is taken the onus should be squarely upon the end user to take steps to secure the network and hardware.   

This approach however carries risk for service providers.  They won’t be getting paid for any fraudulent activity and they have to place great trust in their customers in protecting against fraud when most do not appear to be taking the risk of fraud seriously.  The preferable approach would therefore be to charge for any fraudulent activity and place an obligation on the customer in respect of securing the network and hardware.  There is therefore an incentive for the end user to comply with the obligations to secure the network and hardware.  That is because if it does not then it will be footing the bill.  It is however advisable to offer an application or product to assist your customer in that regard or make recommendations in that regard.   

In any event, it is advisable to chat through with the end user at the outset of any contractual relationship what the position is regarding fraudulent activity and what steps are required with regard to securing the hardware and network.

If you require advice regarding a dispute that has arisen regarding charges incurred as a consequence of fraudulent activity then please contact Marcus Hayes, Head of Commercial Litigation.  Equally, should you require advice regarding your terms and conditions then please contact Karen Houghton, Head of Corporate.

Marcus Hayes & Jessica Eaton, Commercial Litigation, Mason Hayes Solicitors

August 2014

Tuesday, August 19th, 2014

My blog this month is about my political experiences at Mason Hayes.  Mason Hayes takes its social responsibility very seriously which is clear from the fantastic work carried out by the Mason Hayes Charitable Trust.  However, in addition to that, Mason Hayes is actively involved politically with regard to issues which are relevant to the firm or those which members of the firm feel passionately about. 

I personally have been involved in research papers with regard to changes to the Civil Procedure Rules and Civil Litigation generally, providing input on draft legislation and attending meetings with members of Parliament.  Being somebody who once considered a political career, I found these experiences enlightening. 

The most recent contribution that I have made was to a research paper with regard to reform of the civil justice system to improve its efficiency as a whole.  Our submission  included proposed reforms to the use of mediation, the introduction of compulsory mediation, the introduction of small claims adjudication, changes to the use of technology by HMCTS and changes to how litigants in person are dealt with.  I have recently been informed by the firm’s Managing Director that the proposals we submitted are being considered and may well form the basis of further research.   I therefore hope that I will get to undertake further work regarding this research paper moving forward.  Even if our proposals are not the subject of further research, I do anticipate having further involvement in the research project which I look forward to.  It would however be fantastic if one of the changes which we proposed made its way into government policy and was then introduced. 

Our involvement has not however been restricted to legislative matters which directly relate to the legal profession or the practice areas within which the firm operates.  For example, I was invited to attend a meeting with Edward Timpson MP with regard to the Children and Families Bill earlier this year.  The purpose of the meeting was to outline the issues with the current regime and the flaws with the Bill.  This was not just to highlight the difficulties legally but also the detriment that would be caused to children, both in terms of their education but also in terms of the wider social and economic implications. 

I have found that the skill set that you acquire and develop as a lawyer is a set of transferrable skills which would stand you in good stead for a career in politics.  The adversarial and confrontational environment that exists in Parliament and Government is akin to that in the litigation arena.  I can see why there are so many lawyers who move into politics.       

Until my next blog 

Jessica

Twitter Facebook

Mason Hayes Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under registration number 537318. The professional rules relating to our services can be accessed on the Solicitors Regulation Authority website at https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/. Mason Hayes Solicitors and Mason Hayes are trading styles of Mason Hayes Limited which is a company registered in England and Wales under company number: 3401175. Our registered office is Siviter House, No 1 The Grange, Altrincham Road, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5ND. Our VAT number is 803 032 486. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Privacy Policy
Mason Hayes